Jump to content

Talk:1993 Pacific hurricane season/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 04:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • "This activity was the result of an El Niño event, which is the main factor contributing to above-average activity across the Pacific basin.[1] " does anyone actually consider 1993 an El Nino today? I know one tried during the spring but CPC's ONI index never got to official Nino territory at least? YE Pacific Hurricane 04:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you mention directional changes or try to mention why the storm's moved the way they did more often in general? You don't need to be multiple paragraphs but this is kinda a boring read for a season with so many strong storms, and the sections are shorter than that of many passed seasonal GA's for how long some of the storms were (Kenneth's section despite being a near Category 5 is one line longer than Max's and Greg's is only a few lines longer than Max's despite its very long duration). In terms of mentioning intensity changes, you do a much better job covering why they occurred but there are still some omissions. Examples of what could be added (to make this easier for you and I tried to make sure this information was available because I don't want to torture you) include:

The article is very well written just a little lacking content wise, but I made it so that it's relatively easy to fix. YE Pacific Hurricane 04:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Evan, I have addressed these comments. 1993 isnt officially recognized as an El Nino today since there were only four consecutive ONIs, not five. It was then though, as indicated by the source. There's no reliable reference for EPAC ACE. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 20:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]