Talk:1993 Football League Second Division play-off final/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 21:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Comments (and suggest these are implemented, in principle, in the other GAN)
- "while the teams placed from" -> "while those placed from"
- "table partook in play-off semi-finals; the winners of these semi-finals " -> "took part in play-offs; the winners of the play-off semi-finals..."
- "West Brom had" stick with formal names or introduce nicknames.
- Same for Vale.
- Link referee in lead.
- "The pivotal point of the match" a bit OR.
- Link sent off.
- "goals difference" -> "goal difference" and link.
- I would use the sports table module for the league, as seen in 1991 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final for example. Seems more accessible etc.
- "the first leg was" -> "first match of the two-legged tie.
- "Giant striker..." avoid such commentary.
- Play-off semifinal reports seem to be unreferenced.
- Done.EchetusXe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- "1992–93 season" I know it's red linked anyway, but put the "season" into the pipe.
- "tally of namesake" not really requied.
- "42,300 Baggies" don't use nicknames unless you explain them.
- "Vale showing patience and possession" according to?
- "a scissors kick" link.
- "by Ian Taylor tipped" overlink.
- "used his acrobatic skills" bit too commentatorish.
- Link foul.
- "dismissal" link.
- "third Englishman" what about non-Englishmen?
- The source didn't mention them.--EchetusXe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- "for the "Baggies" final goal" nickname
- "from six yards" convert.
- Could crop the Ardilles image so it doesn't leak down into the refs.
- Done.EchetusXe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- "£2 million" non-breaking space.
- Done.--EchetusXe 15:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- "afterwards... my" non-breaking space before the ellpsis.
- Done.--EchetusXe 15:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- "after barely surviving" can we be factual and explain what that really meant?
- "Red carded Peter Swan" not necessary, not even sure this sentence is required.
- I don't think www and .com are needed for websites.
THat's a first pass, I'll put it on hold while we deal with these and then do another run-through. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 10:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Okay thanks, I've taken a crack at that.--EchetusXe 15:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
I think this is good enough now for GA, I made a few cosmetic tweaks, so I'm happy to promote. I'll take a look at the other one of yours as well, perhaps you could pre-empt my review by considering some of the general points above on that article too? Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)