Talk:1991 Union Square derailment

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RPA reference

@Yngvadottir, Reference #20 of this ID of the page seems to be relevant to the article, as the derailment is significantly mentioned as a major factor in the subway's subsequent automation. The reference is: [http://library.rpa.org/pdf/RPA-Moving-Forward.pdf CBTC plan], p. 18. [[Regional Plan Association]]. Retrieved June 11, 2014.

(By the way, the ref is already also at Automation of the New York City Subway.) 50.14.142.33 (talk) 02:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see - I hadn't noticed you had the exact page there, so after reading that yes, it fits, and I've added further info about the source to the footnote. Oddly, it doesn't say a thing that wasn't already in the article - same NYT reference, and the 2005 AP article said exactly that, that the disaster was an impetus to introducing computerized controls. What I hadn't known was that the shuttle was computerized until a fire at Grand Central! Yngvadottir (talk) 02:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. The reason why it isn't described in any grater detail on the PDF is because it's mainly a PDF about communications-based train control on the NYC subway, which the derailment just happens to play a part in.

I added the shuttle note to the other article, too. While it isn't relevant, the shuttle automation is described in detail here. :-) –50.14.142.33 (talk) 02:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lede formulation

There is no one generally accepted name for this accident (for one thing, there was another derailment in Union Square back when a heavy rail line ran through it, which few people are aware of), and the clunky name with disambiguator does not lend itself to starting with it in boldface. Also there are several details that usefully belong at the start of the article, including the approximate time. Hence per MOS:BOLDTITLE this article is better without a "Boldface name of article was ..." opening. Yngvadottir (talk) 14:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1991 Union Square derailment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150202062116/http://gothamist.com/2012/12/23/flashback_revisiting_the_worst_trai.php to http://gothamist.com/2012/12/23/flashback_revisiting_the_worst_trai.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]