Talk:1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election

United States: Louisiana / Governors Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

File:David duke belgium 2008.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:David duke belgium 2008.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article's a bit one-sided.

I'm no fan of David Duke, but Edwin Edwards was not a much better choice. The article mentions Duke's ties to the KKK, but it says nothing about Edwards' allegations of wrongdoing. I believe you're doing readers an injustice by leaving that out. There's a reason why this was called "the race from hell". Voters felt they were having to choose between a racist and a thief.67.45.112.251 (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duke is a liar. In the debate, he apologizes for his past comments on Jews and blacks but today makes a living off of anti-Semitic rants on his websites. Of course he was worse than Edwards. Ghoul flesh (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Ghoul[reply]

Yeah there needs to be a mention of his perceived corruption, "Vote for the lizard, not the wizard", etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Edwards#Second_comeback:_Edwards_vs._Duke,_1991 — Omegatron (talk) 20:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

David Duke em 1978 (cropped)2.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]