Talk:1991 Albanian parliamentary election/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Iaof2017 (talk · contribs) 09:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: LefterDalaka (talk · contribs) 17:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): b (OR): b (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): b (OR): b (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass:
The article is well written and follows the Manual of Style guidelines. It has reliable sources and gives the reader a complete first understanding. The author of the article is an experienced Wikipedian who knows how to write good articles. LefterDalaka (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC) P.S. This is my first attempt to review a good article, so be kind with me 😊