Talk:1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cloudz679 (talk · contribs) 11:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First skim through, more to follow later…
link £, "free kick"
Wright's transfer is in the background section but it happened during the season so it would be good to have it mentioned there, more than the current "he made his debut".

Not sure if this makes a difference as it's in the appropriate section; I feel it serves as a preface for readers for ins and outs that season. Same with how I dealt with Wenger's arrival here Lemonade51 (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prose needs to be adjusted
- "possessing the division's best attack"
- "finished seven points clear" clarify
- "Tottenham Hotspur, who beat Nottingham Forest" had beaten
- "The major absentee" strange wording
- "each team held the trophy for six months each" don't need the second "each"
- "work on its finishing" their, about the finishing of multiple individuals
- "during the season they and 21 other clubs resigned from the competition and joined the newly formed Premier League.[25][26]" this is confusing, they resigned during the season?

Well, yes in technical terms. But simplified it as the technicalities aren't important.

- "played down"
- "got on the scoresheet"
- "a midweek European football tie" ambiguous as tie can mean draw
- "had taken a turn for the worst" I believe it's "worse" but the phrase should be replaced
- "picked up no points"
- "was unapparent" not clear if he played
- "goalless affairs"
- "A small crowd of 22,352" small is unnecessarily subjective
- "Perhaps a noteworthy incident of the match was rockets launched on the pitch by Arsenal supporters, in protest of the club's bond scheme." reword
- "six of Arsenal's goals in fact came in the second half." in fact
- "18 points off the top"
- "After a fortnight and three days" very strangely worded
- "inflicted a fifth consecutive league defeat for" on
- "prevented the league leaders from increasing their gap to Manchester United"
- "adjudged to foul Limpar" have fouled
- "the equaliser put in by Adams"
- "Arsenal inflicted Liverpool their worst defeat in nine years on 21 April 1992"
- "Wright pipped Tottenham striker Gary Lineker"
- "The first match ended in a score draw, where a debut Wright goal was cancelled out two minutes before the end."

"Arsenal was left", *"Watford, who was staging", "Arsenal was beaten", "Arsenal was beaten" were. I notice regular inconsistencies with using singular or plural forms for Arsenal.

Have used 'Arsenal are' if the sentence refers to the club, 'the team were' if it's about the team.

"the North Bank was entitled" says who?
Quotes should be attributed, e.g. "The England striker responded resoundingly to Graham Taylor's criticism of his ineffective performance against Germany a week earlier."

C 679 11:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thorough review, believe I have addressed all your comments. Lemonade51 (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Arsenal represented England in the European Cup for the first time since" Does this mean that they were the first club to represent England since the ban?
"their time in the competition was short-lived" prose, missed it on the first reading
Why is one of the columns in the friendlies section entitled "Score F–A"? Perhaps it would be better just score, with a note "Arsenal's score first", or similar
"had taken a turn for the worst" I believe it's "worse" but the phrase should be replaced - noted above
"Despite an improved defensive performance away to Manchester City" what does it mean, they conceded fewer goals, or made more of an effort, or something else?
Per Wikipedia:Quotations, "Quotations must be verifiably attributed to a reliable source". I mentioned this before, but there are still at least five unattributed quotes: "Attribution should be provided in the text of the article, not exclusively in a footnote or citation. A reader should not have to follow a footnote to learn whose words a quote is" (GA criteria 2b)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
See above.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
All quotations need verifiable attribution to a reliable source, in the text of the article. AGF on offline sources, which are the majority of those used in this article.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Just a few things to iron out. C 679 19:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have made corrections, thanks once more. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections are all in order. Final references check:
fn16 is used for loans of Miller and Morrow but seems to only cover Miller's deal.
fn120 is used for the league cup result on 30 October, but the reference is dated 9 October
Although the team's concentration and effort was improved in their next match - sounds like opinion. whose is it? C 679 06:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Think I've got them all now, cheers. Lemonade51 (talk) 10:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy would be improved if the loans out "Return" column used specific dates rather than the current vague spans, e.g. Morrow's 4 months and 4 days being listed as 5 months, but the same player's 2 months and 27 days at barnet being listed as 2 months. May not be so easy for Cole's spell though. C 679 12:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Used specific dates. Cole joined Bristol City permanently in July 1992 according to the Times. It was a one-month loan initially, which happened during the 1991-92 season. Guardian is the only source which made reference to that, hence why I cited it instead of Soccerbase. Lemonade51 (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. C 679 16:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]