Talk:1990s in film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link to Films or Books?

As I've been tapping through some of these links, I've noticed that sometimes it's the page for book on which the film is based, rather than the page for the film itself that shows up. Which is preferred?

Given that it's 1990s in film I suggest that it should be the page for the film that is linked. However, I don't want to start going through homologising the links only for the community to disagree on that point.

--Froginvestor (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree and I don't think anyone would have a problem with fixing the links. -user:hsxeric

There are some mistakes in the highest-grossing films. — Preceding unsigned comment added by T-burton-90 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"List of films" or "List of years in film" for an article about a decade in film?

I have this question regarding articles like this one. Do we really need lists like the one in this particular article? It is bulky and it is almost of no use other than to find out which '90s films start with the letter A, or B, or C, etc. For me, the lists are provided and detailed well enough in the individual years in films that they only need to be linked in this article to provide readers an opportunity to check out the individual films of the decade. LionFosset (talk) 04:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office chart is inconsistent.

Similar to the 1980s chart, editors can't seem to agree whether to use original release numbers (ex: Titanic) or lifetime gross numbers (ex: Seven). Also, beware of Box Office Mojo's incomplete info for international numbers especially for the 20th century. ShiranuiAensland (talk) 21:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]