Talk:1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
I'll take a look. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Not a fan of one-sentence paras in lead. try and meld somewhere....
- Added something on players winning awards in the lead and the squad stats section.
Arsenal sold a number of fringe players throughout the season so Graham could trim his squad. - err, surely the players were sold (thereby trimming the squad) so he could expand the squad with new players....?
The flow through the months is okay, but there is a little bit of "and then (match)....and then (match)...and then (match)." I wonder if a little more fleshing out here would be good. e.g. the dustup that earnt Davis a 9 match suspension. Anything else about any particular match or in-form or out-of-form players/goals etc.
- I've fleshed out what I feel are the interesting/notable games that season, let me know if you think more is needed. I only have access to few publications atm, so can't expand as much as I'd like to. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Otherwise looking pretty "Good"..... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments @Casliber:, have replied to some of your comments above. :) Lemonade51 (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- That looks fine - it gives it some atmosphere and works well.
NB: Earwigs copyvio is clear. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - as noted above. comprehensive and engaging read Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)