Jump to content

Talk:1987 Football League Second Division play-off final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1987 Football League Second Division play-off final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 20, 2021Good article nomineeListed
May 23, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
January 22, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article


[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:56, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1987 Football League Second Division play-off Final. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

copyedit

[edit]

Hope it's overall helpful, sorry for any tweaks that weren't, I made the changes one-by-one to make it easier to undo! —valereee (talk) 19:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Top scorers

[edit]

@The Rambling Man:

Charlton Athletic top scorer: Jim Melrose (14 goals; all in league)

Charlton Athletic second top scorer: Mark Stuart (11 goals; 9 in league, 1 in FA Cup, 1 in League Cup).

Charlton Athletic source: <ref>{{cite book |editor-first=Peter |editor-last=Dunk |title=Rothmans Football Yearbook 1987–88 |year=1987 |publisher=Queen Anne Press |location=London |isbn=978-0-356-14354-5 |pages=116–117, 451–456, 458–460, 484}}</ref>

Leeds United top scorer: Ian Baird (19 goals; 15 in league, 4 in FA Cup)

Leeds United second top scorer: John Sheridan (15 goals; all in league)

Leeds United source: <ref>{{cite book |editor-first=Peter |editor-last=Dunk |title=Rothmans Football Yearbook 1987–88 |year=1987 |publisher=Queen Anne Press |location=London |isbn=978-0-356-14354-5 |pages=204–205, 451–454, 458, 486–489}}</ref>

Mattythewhite (talk) 22:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1987 Football League Second Division play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Taking a look now....

NB:Earwig's copyvio is clear

Otherwise seeing very little to complain about Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Casliber I think I've addressed your concerns, but do let me know if I missed anything? Cheers for the review. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 11:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: a nice read Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]