Jump to content

Talk:1982 World Snooker Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article1982 World Snooker Championship is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 24, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 24, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 26, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 14, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Davis/Griffiths in 1982

[edit]

Is there any citation/reference for the notion that Davis was "worn out after a year on the road" leading to his defeat by Knowles and that Griffiths was demotivated after Davis' defeat?

I certainly don't know for sure that either of these statements is incorrect, and the former seems reasonably plausible, but the latter less so - surely Davis' defeat would have been the greatest possible motivation for Griffiths - if he had played like he'd done all season, he would only have had to turn up to win his second title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.111.223.190 (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contested edits

[edit]

Only because I saw the back and forth between two editors on this article all morning, I reviewed the edits from both. It appears to me that both agree on the facts. What strikes me most is that there are absolutely no references cited at all to support any claims about 'expectations', whether or not there were 'upsets', someone's physical or mental state ('worn out'), and whether someone was a 'favorite'... Without anything to substantiate that language, there's nothing left but the scores and who won and lost. Wikipelli Talk 16:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, the more I look at this article, the more I want to completely rewrite most of it. I have no idea what snooker is, barely ever heard of it before today, but I know that there are no citations, tons of peacock words, and really sounds like a fan's report rather than an encyclopedia article. I'll leave it go for a bit - hopefully those who are more knowledgable and passionate about the sport will take to editing out the puffery. Then I might have a go. :) I mean, 3 years ago the validity of one of the statements was questioned! If it's not going to be deleted, it ought to be cleaned up. Wikipelli Talk 22:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I became an avid snooker around this time and watched this most enthralling of World Snooker Championships - it still remains my all-time favourite - unfold on TV (the previous year was my first one I saw). It was widely agreed in hindsight that Steve Davis did go into the 1982 World Championship utterly worn out through overdoing it on the road,though they didn't see the pitfall that was waiting for them at the time. He and Barry Hearn were blazing a trail of endorsements,appearances,etc. that was probably unprecedented in the game at a time when the game's popularity was soaring.

I have never heard of that about Terry Griffiths and was most surprised to see it. Griffiths,for who the unexpected removal of Davis would have shone out as an inviting opportunity,was immediately installed as favourite upon Davis's surprise exit.

When Cliff Thorburn was blitzed out by Jimmy White as well three of the top four seeds were out,and Dennis Taylor was fifth seed when he also came unstuck,against debutant Silvino Francisco,with Fred Davis also bowing out,against Junior Pot Black winner Dean Reynolds who was also a Crucible first-timer.

I have read many sources re: Davis. One of them is the Guinness Book of Snooker by Clive Everton,which came out in 1982 (this might be quite rare by now but I still have a copy). This also has all the qualifiers up to that year in it,and full up-to-date records can also be found in the Rothmans Snooker Yearbook,which was edited by Janice Hale and ran from the mid-80s up to 1991.

Qualifying for the 1982 Embassy World Championship

[edit]
FYI

John Bear beat F Jonik 9-4; John Bear beat J Wych 9-4

Dennis Hughes beat C Everton 9-4; T Meo beat Dennis Hughes 9-4

D Reynolds beat D Sheehan 9-5; D Reynolds beat R Edmonds 9-6

E Hughes wo D Mienie scr; T Knowles beat E Hughes 9-7

M Wildman beat G Foulds 9-8; J White beat M Wildman 9-4

C Roscoe beat B Mikkelsen 9-6; W Thorne beat C Roscoe 9-1

P Medati beat J Phillips 9-3; C Wilson beat P Medati 9-5

P Houlihan beat I Anderson 9-5; D Martin beat P Houlihan 9-3

M Macleod beat E McLaughlin 9-8; J Dunning beat M Macleod 9-4

M Watterson beat B Demarco 9-6; J Meadowcroft beat M Watterson 9-7

D French beat B Bennett 9-3; P Fagan beat D French 9-6

I Black beat M Parkin 9-6; R Williams beat I Black 9-2

J Johnson beat V Harris 9-4; M Hallett beat J Johnson 9-8

J Donnelly beat M Gibson 9-8; E Sinclair beat B Kelly 9-8; J Donnelly beat E Sinclair 9-8

P Morgan beat D Greaves 9-2; S Francisco beat C Ross 9-0; S Francisco beat P Morgan 9-1

M Morra beat Tommy Murphy 9-5; J Fitzmaurice wo J Pulman scr; J Fitzmaurice beat M Morra 9-7


188.29.8.15 (talk) 00:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Ralph[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1982 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1982 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1982 World Snooker Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 14:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meta-discussion

[edit]

Assessment

[edit]
  1. Comprehension: The comprehension of the article is good.
    2. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) The prose is well writen. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) The article is complaint with the manual of style Pass Pass
  2. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
    3. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) References are provided and in compliance with the manual of style. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) Citations are from reliable sources. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) No original research was found. Pass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) No copyright issues were found. Pass Pass
  3. Comprehensiveness: The article is broad and focus in its coverage.
    4. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) The article's coverage is appropriately broad. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The article is focused and without any unnecessary deviations. Pass Pass
  4. Neutrality: The article is complaint with the policy on neutral point of view.
    5. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No editorial bias or neutrality issues were observed Pass Pass
  5. Stability: The article is stable.
    6. Pass Pass
    Notes Result
    No edit warring or content disputes. Pass Pass
  6. Illustration: The article is well illustrated with appropriate images and other graphical features.
    7. Pass Pass
    Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Images are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use of images is appropriate with suitable captions present. Pass Pass

Current status: Pass Pass

Comments

[edit]
  • One minor issue was spotted, the main draw and qualifying use different abbreviations for South Africa. Looking at other articles on World Snooker Championship, the abbreviation of RSA seems to be the appropriate one. Tayi Arajakate Talk 15:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong best of frames in semis

[edit]

The amount of frames was best of 31 not 33 But don't know how to change it 86.174.150.52 (talk) 06:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I've added a "SF frames" parameter, default is 33. Nigej (talk) 07:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1982_World_Snooker_Championship&oldid=1221198083"