Jump to content

Talk:1982 Benson & Hedges Cup final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1982 Benson & Hedges Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 18:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will review. MWright96 (talk) 18:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Route to the final

[edit]

Summary

[edit]

Aftermath

[edit]

References

[edit]

Those were the issues I found. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Thanks for the review; I have responded to each point above. Harrias talk 10:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Harrias: Am happy with the changes and will promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 12:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]