Talk:1980 World Champions' Gold Cup

Fair use rationale for Image:Copa D Oro - Mundialito 1980.jpg

Image:Copa D Oro - Mundialito 1980.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

England

Why did England decline to participate? Drutt (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final rankig

Is there any source for places 3 to 6 in the final ranking? If not it is OR and should be deleted!--Je suis blocked by Darkwind 11:01, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

It was added by an IP here, so I delete it immediately.--Je suis blocked by Darkwind 11:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1980 Mundialito. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131106214943/http://rsssf.com:80/tablesm/mund80.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesm/mund80.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Status as a friendly tournament

While it seems clear that the tournament was not held by FIFA, and thus a friendly in FIFA's eyes, I don't think the organizers themselves considered it a friendly. A similar situation happened in the Arab Champions Cup page, which is considered a friendly by FIFA, but not by the tournament organizers. I thought it was normal for both tournaments to be categorized as friendlies, but the people there told me that not only should it not say it's a friendly, it shouldn't mention FIFA's lack of involvement at all. I find this contradiction puzzling. BlackenedTheUSSR (talk) 17:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]