Talk:1980 United States Grand Prix

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1980 United States Grand Prix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Formula One Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed as: 1980 United States Grand Prix East

I think the 1980 United States Grand Prix should be as redirect to have a new article called the 1980 United States Grand Prix East, it will have the same stuff as it is.Rowde (talk) 17:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See centralised discussion. DH85868993 (talk) 02:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. This was thoroughly researched and consensus for the current situation was established. Here is the relevant discussion. T v x1 13:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]