Talk:1980 Pennsylvania Lottery scandal

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disambiguation Page

Do you think a disambiguation page is in order?

I just created an article for Assemblyman N. Nick Perry, and when you type in Assemblyman Nick Perry you get redirected to this page.

Ruthfulbarbarity 00:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 666 drawing 4/1/05

The combination 666 was indeed drawn on 4/1/05 [1]. I'm re-adding that. --SamMichaels 21:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Twin Skippy beat me to it :) Instead, I added clarification that it was the nightly drawing. --SamMichaels 21:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed split of Nick Perry

Disagree with the proposed split here. Nick Perry is only notable for this one incident, and in order to explain the scandal properly Nick Perry has to be discussed here anyway. A split-off article would be, as it stands, would either be very short (unless his announcing career was a lot more notable than it seems) or else duplicate a lot of the content in this article. I'd be opposed to it unless you or others have more information to add on Mr. Perry such that there began to be too much information on Perry that wasn't relevant to the scandal article. As it stands, the brief background on Perry and his announcing career is relevant and would be included in this article anyway even if a Nick Perry article was spun off. SnowFire (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the Nick Perry split. Local announcer and bowling celebrity, but doesn't seem notable enough. -- SEWilco (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]