Talk:1980 Azores Islands earthquake/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 20:20, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Initial comments

• This article is well referenced and reasonably comprehensive in scope.
• The Relief efforts and response contains information about the relief effort and the subsequent installation of monitoring equipment; however there is no information about the rebuilding programme. The previous section, Damage and casualties, mentions consider damage to homes yet there is no discussion at all in the final section about the rebuilding efforts.

Pyrotec (talk) 09:19, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I've done my best from the sources I have. I'll see if there are any mentions of rebuilding efforts. ceranthor 21:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A short, well-referenced article on a specific earthquake.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   No images, other than location map.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   No images, other than location map.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on your efforts on acheiving this standard. Pyrotec (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)