Talk:1975 Haicheng earthquake

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1975 Haicheng earthquake article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earthquakes High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:1975 Haicheng earthquake is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 22 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kmcgowa2, Dirtyterp. Peer reviewers: Ssathien, Nicksalanitri, Johnskae, Sktalwar, Rjones222, Jmarin12, Nwalls3528, Zafir Alolade.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Daniel Ducote.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earthworms?

Someone added a bunch of uncited nonsense about earthworms fleeing their burrows. I am going to revert it unless someone can cite this. MikeJPalmer (talk) 09:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A lengthy report on the Haicheng earthquake is available in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v 96, pp 757-795. The authors- all Chinese- reviewed the recently declassified data surrounding this important earthquake and earthquake prediction, and put it in the context of modern Chinese history. They examined reports on peculiar animal behavior, among many other precursory phenomena. One minor example: some people reported that mice were unafraid of people in a period between foreshocks and mainshock. 136.177.30.205 (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)StephenCHarmsen[reply]

Yes, StephenCHarmsen, the article you mention is the authoritative source. I inserted a ref to it, and modified the text to reflect what is in that article.MaxWyss (talk) 07:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC)MaxWyss[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://quake.exit.com/A010720.html
- In Haicheng, Liaoning on 2011-03-22 19:03:52, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In Haicheng, Liaoning on 2011-04-13 04:41:45, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In Haicheng, Liaoning on 2011-04-22 04:14:01, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 1975 Haicheng earthquake on 2011-05-25 04:39:48, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 1975 Haicheng earthquake on 2011-06-06 21:09:56, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

11-23 Revisions

Hello! As part of my Wikipedia Student Editing Project, I have made the following contributions to this article: 1. I rewrote the first paragraph, as the information was found to be plagiarized from another site. 2. I added a bit of description for this earthquake's classification, 7.3, on the Richter Scale to give average readers a more wordly understanding of the practical meaning of this scientific term. 3. I added hyperlinks to the following Wikipedia articles for further reading: earthquake, 7.3 (richter classification), infrastructure, property, groundwater, and soil. 4. I added two pieces of additional content to this article, each with a scientific reference (currently sources 6 and 7 in the article's bibliography). The first contribution can be found in the second paragraph, "A low-level alert was triggered by regional increases in seismicity (later recognized as foreshocks). Both authorities and citizens were finally placed on high alert and an evacuation order was issued due to an increase in foreshocks." This information elaborates on the warning signs scientists used to predict this earthquake before it occurred. The second contribution can be found in the final paragraph, and it explains the usefulness of this one earthquake's successful prediction to the scientific community and what it could mean for the future of earthquake predictions. --Daniel Ducote (talk) 07:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Needs rewriting, based on a review of the literature

While this earthquake is considered very notable, and warrants a suitable article, I find this article to be quite deficient. At present it presents a very shallow, uncritical bare-bones account, based on a handful of websites (some now "404") that only echo the authoritative sources. (The one significant source, Wang et al. 2006, is also inadequately cited.) I am going to add some tags, but this article really needs to be rewritten, based on a review of the literature. For anyone that is interested (and has the time, which I don't) I can recommend some sources. I suggest starting with the pertinent sources at Earthquake prediction. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Earthquake prediction scrutiny: Last paragraph

The last paragraph in Natural occurrences and earthquake prediction (§Earthquake prediction scrutiny) refers to the 1976 Tangshan Earthquake in a somewhat convoluted manner. Munchyhunch (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]