Talk:1965 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"tropical storm, developed during the month of June in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, while located south of Guatemala." remove "Eastern" Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed--12george1 (talk) 05:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd cut back on storms a bit in the lead.YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know about that, it was a pretty boring season, except for Betsy. Would should I do, put more emphasis into Betsy?--12george1 (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Because the 65 was a crudy season, is why it IMO should be shorter.
    - Well, we have a similar format for the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season, which is an FA, shall I mention.--12george1 (talk) 00:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Any the number of hurricane/TD's/major hurricanes to the lead? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure what you are saying. Are you asking me to state the number of tropical depressions, hurricanes, and major hurricane in the lead?--12george1 (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yea. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 02:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fixed--12george1 (talk) 00:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move the timeline graph to the SS. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed--12george1 (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"though damage, if any is unknown." why mention it if it is unknown?
- Fixed--12george1 (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why was One not named? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed; it was operationally considered a TD for its entire duration.--12george1 (talk) 05:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"During that day and August 25, several ships reported tropical storm and hurricane force winds." Can you expand I that please? Were thet useful? What was the peak wind?
- Wasn't too important. I don't know why I even added that little tidbit.--12george1 (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd add Besty's peak winds and maybe pressure to it's summary. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed--12george1 (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Thus, Elena likely reached hurricane status at 0600 UTC that day.[5] " Change "Thus" to "Therefore" to create more varied sentence strcure IMO. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed--12george1 (talk) 00:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ref #14 Remove staff writer. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed--12george1 (talk) 00:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ref #15 Remove staff writer. Thanks. YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed--12george1 (talk) 00:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do any of the newspapers have articles? YE ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed--12george1 (talk) 00:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.^[1]

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);^[2] and

(c) it contains no original research.

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;^[3] and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

^[4]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

^[5]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.^[6]

Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone

^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage, is not required for good articles.
^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.
^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1] Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage, is not required for good articles.

[2] Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

[3] This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.

[4] Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.

[5] Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

[6] The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]