Jump to content

Talk:1964 Illinois House of Representatives election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article1964 Illinois House of Representatives election is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 3, 2024.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 30, 2023Good article nomineeListed
January 27, 2024Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 16, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 1964, Illinoisans cast more than 500 million votes in one election?
Current status: Featured article


GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:1964 Illinois House of Representatives election/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Theleekycauldron (talk · contribs) 08:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there! I'll be taking this up :) I can't offer a firm timeline as to when to expect comments, so feel free to request a new reviewer at any time. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 08:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

Sourcing

[edit]
  • It'd probably be better to rework the text to not have to rely on Chamberlain as a source.
    • I've replaced it for the sentence where it's the only source. As for the other two places it's cited, the first is to give someone a reference to the relevant part of the constitution (as a useful primary source), and the second is to determine the incumbency status of candidates. I don't see either use as problematic. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • did not appoint former governor Stratton, the architect of this redistricting process I'd probably call that OR given the source.
  • Two lawsuits were decided by the Supreme Court on January 4, 1964 don't see in source
  • Page numbers on Green 1987?

Breadth questions

[edit]

Overall

[edit]

@Elli: Fantastic job on the expansion! Prose and breadth look great; I'm going to make some sourcing spot-checks and hopefully I can get this done today. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Elli: Awesome, thank you so much :) Elli (talk | contribs) 23:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Elli: you won't believe this, but that's... all from me? I've made a bunch of fixes in-article and left some other stuff here. Once it's straightened out, you're good to go :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great :) I'll work on addressing your remaining feedback today. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: can you take a look now? I've addressed almost everything here. As for the things that I haven't: I don't have much of an opinion on whether the members of the commission should be in prose or as a list, but I don't know how best to present them as a list, so I've left them as prose. Also not sure what a more rigorous endorsements section would look like as listing them like we do on most election pages would be a huge mess. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and we are... done! very nice job :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 20:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sample ballot in the 1964 Illinois House of Representatives election
Sample ballot in the 1964 Illinois House of Representatives election

Improved to Good Article status by Elli (talk). Self-nominated at 06:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/1964 Illinois House of Representatives election; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • I'll review the first hook, since IMHO it is the most interesting. GA recentness (and of course length) checks out. Sourcing checks out, images in articles are properly licensed. QPQ is good. Good job on getting this to GA; I watched an interesting video about this election recently. Generalissima (talk) 22:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Ballot per county?

[edit]

The pictured sample ballot was printed by Lake County. Was the actual ballot also printed separately by each county, or was a single ballot printed and used statewide? Did any counties not print sample ballots? jnestorius(talk) 14:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No 2605:8D80:423:B1FB:719C:11B:5586:9ADD (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name cuange

[edit]

Recent to charge to match name to” On November 3, 1964, Illinois chose all 177 members” for better understanding 2605:8D80:423:B1FB:719C:11B:5586:9ADD (talk) 16:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]