Talk:1962–63 Leicester City F.C. season

Football: England / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. Jameboy (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Ice Kings (football) be merged into 1962–63 Leicester City F.C. season. The two articles are virtually identical in scope, i.e. they cover the Leicester City team of 1962–63. Jameboy (talk) 23:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related article mergers. Jameboy (talk) 23:30, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. C 679 11:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Perfect reasoning, IMO. – Pee Jay 00:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, no need for a seperate article. Giant Snowman 12:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger completed

I have performed a fairly crude merger, focusing on bringing the content in and removing some of the crossover. I haven't really looked at the quality of the prose or validated the references. I will revisit some time later, but any copyedits or sourcing in the meantime would be welcome. --Jameboy (talk) 01:01, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]