This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
I see there is disagreement between the Nohlen et al book (an academic compendium of election results) and the Tal book on politics. It's difficult to know which is more likey to be correct, but I do need convincing that it's a good idea to change away from the Nohlen source, particularly as it is used for the vast majority of the the other Jordanian election results. Number5720:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57: I think lawrence's source is more accurate, it mentions the Hizb Al-Tahrir MP that didn't give his confidence to Nabulsi's government, 39 out of 40 voted for... Also theres no mention of the Communist MP Abdullah Rimawi that participated in Nabulsi's government. Makeandtoss (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Makeandtoss: (apologies for the delay in responding) What evidence is that? I am confused by your statement about Rimawi as he was from the Ba'ath Party not the Communists, at least according to his article. Number5710:40, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, the first link just takes me to the info page about the book, not a page in it. Convinced now, I will self-revert. Cheers, Number5711:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]