Talk:1949 New Zealand crown/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 11:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Going to review another one of your articles, comments to follow shortly :) Unexpectedlydian^♯4 talk^‽ 11:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Generalissima Great article, well done! Just a few questions from me on the sources. Otherwise, almost ready for GA. Unexpectedlydian^♯4 talk^‽ 12:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Lead Y Background Y Production Y Release Y
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead sections Y Layout Y Words to watch None identified. Fiction N/A List incorporation N/A
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Sources are cited appropriately and in the correct layout.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Source check Below is a review of a selection of sources. Stocker, Mark (2010) Y Stocker, Mark (2011) the 1940 Centennial half-crown was produced in far larger quantities and entered circulation at face value. Due to considerable demand from collectors, the coin quickly fell out of circulation. Apologies if I'm missing something in the source - I can't find info on p.221 which references the half-crown being produced in larger quantities, entering at face-value, or that the reason for its decline was due to collectors. Cook, Megan ~~Where in the source does it confirm that this was the fifth visit by a British prince?~~ "Royal Tours Abroad". New Zealand Herald. Y Royal visit badge". Museum of New Zealand. Y Royal Visit to N.Z. in 1949 Announced". The Press. Y "Royal Visit To N.Z. Before Australia". Northern Advocate. Y Proposed Commemorative Crown Piece Y Notes of Meetings Y "Special Crown Piece May Be Struck By N.Z. To Mark Royal Visit". Wanganui Chronicle. Whilst the publication date of the source is 1 June, the report was from 31 May. Should the article therefore say "Following Australian consideration of a commemorative coin in a four-shilling denomination, Minister of Finance Walter Nash moved in ~~June~~ May to support the Royal Numismatic Society's proposal of a circulating commemorative coin." Minting of Crowns". Wanganui Chronicle. Y New Zealand Crown Piece Y Royal Mint Annual Report 1948 Y The King's Health". The Press Y NEW ZEALAND. Crown, 1949. PCGS PROOF-66 Gold Shield". Stacks Bowers. Y
	2c. it contains no original research.	Through conducting source spot-checks, content there has been no OR.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Source spot-checks brought up nothing of concern. Copyvio detector also brings up nothing of concern.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The article addresses all main aspects of the topic - background, production, and its release.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Where background is mentioned, it is relevant to the article topic.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Content is presented neutrally.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Article is stable, majority of edits are by the nominator. No evidence of edit wars.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images are tagged.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Y
	7. Overall assessment.

Ope, I meant to also cite the Waitangi crown article on the Stocker (2011) sentence. Fixed that. - G
For the Cook source; it doesn't explicitly say that it was the fifth visit, but it counts four prior visits; three by Alfred, one by Edward, Prince of Wales. Since royal visits were so rare during this period, I feel it's reasonable to assume they weren't missing any. - G
Oh, good catch! Fixed. - G

@Unexpectedlydian: Thank you so much for your feedback! Made edits as requested. Generalissima (talk) 20:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Generalissima Brilliant, thank you for addressing those. Happy to promote to GA now, well done! Unexpectedlydian^♯4 talk^‽ 11:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]