Talk:1940 Mandatory Palestine v Lebanon football match/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 04:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

and the former's last (under British control) — It doesn't look like the parenthetical nuance is in the body of the article.

The Mandatory Palestine national football team (Mandatory Palestine) is the national football team of Mandatory Palestine. FIFA considers the Israel national football team (Israel) the successor team of Mandatory Palestine. Thus, the idea is that obviously Israel didn't stop playing football, but the match v Lebanon is their last under the name "Mandatory Palestine". Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is now adequately addressed in the new section, where it mentions Israel as the successor team.

Background

the Mandatory Palestine players were invited to tea and cake — Who invited them?

Haaretz states: "14 players received a telegram [...] they sipped a cup of tea or coffee and received a brief explanation of the game against Lebanon the next day." The Israel Football Association states: "On the eve of the game, players were invited to tea and cake at a cafe on Rothschild Boulevard for a conversation and explanation." I would imagine that the federation had invited the players, but this is all the info I could find. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They were told that each player had to go to the locker room at the stadium on their own, with their own soccer shoes. The players did not train for the game and, in the small dressing room, only 14 received the light-blue-and-white kit. — Was this unusual? Considering that this was likely close to recreational occupation for the players, it doesn't sound that surprising to me.

I wouldn't know, as I am not an expert on 1940s football. Anyway this info seems to be present in more than one source, so I thought it would be an interesting detail to note (irregardless of whether or not it was common practice at the time). Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Match

and Mandatory Palestine's last — Perhaps you could add some information here about their other games, e.g., "; they had lost each of their prior four matches."

Done Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About 10,000 spectators ... came to watch the game — One of the sources says 9,000. Any reason for the discrepancy?

No idea why. I would rather rely on contemporary sources saying 10,000. Maybe they thought that "about 10,000" meant <10,000, therefore 9,000-ish. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was followed by a penalty kick — From the penalty box? Is the reason for the kick known (i.e., what was the foul)?

The Palestine Post just states: "Schneiderovich scored from the 12-yard spot." The nature of the foul is unknown. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like there are some details you can add about the third goal (ran around the defense; into an empty net)

Done Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After that goal, the Lebanese coach asked Mandatory Palestine coach Arthur Baar to go easy — How does the source describe this? Was that a common request at the time? When teams take it down a notch in blowouts nowadays, it seems to be by tacit rather than overt agreement.

Not sure whether or not is was common at the time, but Haaretz states "At this point [after Mandatory Palestine's 5th goal], the Lebanese national team coach talked with Barr [Mandatory Palestine coach]. Beer later said that his Lebanese counterpart sought to maintain good relations between Lebanon and Israel, and not to defeat them in a harsh and disgraceful manner. Indeed, from that moment, the Eretz Israel players began to play across the field, and they didn't score past the Lebanese goal."

That's pretty interesting—especially as it suggests a geopolitical element to the request—and I would think worth adding. But let me know if you disagree.

Done Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 19:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any word on what Fuchs's injury was? I had thought it was relatively minor until reading the part about taking him to the hospital.

No idea. You have to take into consideration that these were the 1940s, and what we would consider minor today might have been "hospital-worthy" back then. Also, I would imagine that no medics were present on the field, so maybe having to directly go to the hospital was the only solution (however grave the injury was). Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 19:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Details

Any reason "Tripoli" isn't red-linked?

To date there are three Tripoli-based clubs, that I know of. AC Tripoli, founded in 2005, Al Egtmaaey Tripoli SC, founded in 1956, and Al Riyada Wal Adab Club, founded in 1930. Obviously it's very likely that the latter is the candidate to be the "Tripoli" the source is referring to. But I would rather not fall into WP:OR. What do you think? Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That makes total sense to me, thanks for the explanation.

Overall

Nice article, Nehme1499. It would be nice to have a short section discussing analysis of the game; for instance, the "Lebanon Outclassed by Palestine Selected" article contains some post-match analysis that could easily be worked in (e.g., "the game did not come up to expectations"; "a rather one-sided match"; "The goalie ... saved brilliantly on several occasions. The goals that did get past him would have beaten any custodian.") Other than that, just minor comments above. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernameunique:

Done. Thanks for starting the nomination so early! I never expected someone to be this interested ahaha. I'm sure that the various sentences I added need a bit of "refining", so just let me know what to change. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, Nehme1499. It's a really nice article, and well done on the new section. I've added one suggestion and one question above. I'm basically happy to pass it as-is, but figured I'd give you a chance to respond to those points first. --Usernameunique (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Usernameunique: I should have taken care of everything now. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 19:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great, Nehme1499. Passing now. --Usernameunique (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]