Talk:1927 Pacific typhoon season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 17:46, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hurricanehink. I guess I will review this article this afternoon to return the favor. At first glance, this looks like another great effort on your part. But there are some things that need to be fixed before I can pass this article.

In the infobox, change the link to the 1927 PHS to 1920–29 Pacific hurricane seasons#1927 season
"affected the Philippines, China, and Japan, collectively leaving ." - Collectively leaving nothing? :O :P If you meant to leave the damage and death toll there, make sure you mention that the damage figure is USD
"mostly related to mountain flooding near Zhangzhou," - Was it just flooding in the mountainous areas (like it says later in the article) or was this Orographic lift?
"after a 3.0 m (10 ft) tsunami washed away boats" - You spelled out all other units so far. Why not put meters and feet here?
"The Philippines government insurance fund claimed ₱16,149.25 in damages" - Wikilink to Philippine peso
There are a few instances of references in the wrong order in the Systems section. For example: "just south of the Japanese island of Kyushu.[9][5][13]"
"estimated at US$1 million in damage" - Why did you mention USD this late in the article?
"After the storm the Philippine government provided aid to residents. A tornado spawned by the typhoon hit Metro Manila." - Given that the first sentence is aftermath and the latter is impact, shouldn't the order of these sentences be switched?
On Reference 11, the date needs to be switch from 2 June 1927 to June 2, 1927

That's about it. Fix or address these issues in a timely manner and I will be glad to pass this article--12george1 (talk) 17:46, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed some, but not all of them. I am not Hurricanehink.--SMB99thx XD (contribs) 04:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:SMB99thx! :) I believe all of these concerns have been addressed now. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it looks like everything has been done. So without further ado, I will now pass this article--12george1 (talk) 23:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]