Talk:1924 Cuba hurricane/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I will be reviewing this article which is currently up for Good Article Nomination. I should have the full review out shortly. Cyclonebiskit 20:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Very well done Hink! I just have one little nitpick with the records, specifically the 922 mbar pressure reading. Should it be mentioned that the record was broken by the 1935 Labor Day Hurricane? Cyclonebiskit 20:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, technically the 922 was broken by the 1932 Cuba hurricane (which had 915), but if this storm's 910 is taken, then it wasn't broken until the Labor Day hurricane. Given the slight confusion, I opted not to mention what broke it, but if you have a good solution I'm open to change it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- The 910 is estimated though, so the lowest recorded pressure (forgot that the 1932 storm had 915) would be broken by the 1932 hurricane. I do see how it's confusing though. Cyclonebiskit 22:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh duh. Thanks, ok I got it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, that should do it, I'm passing the article now, well done. Cyclonebiskit 12:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh duh. Thanks, ok I got it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- The 910 is estimated though, so the lowest recorded pressure (forgot that the 1932 storm had 915) would be broken by the 1932 hurricane. I do see how it's confusing though. Cyclonebiskit 22:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, technically the 922 was broken by the 1932 Cuba hurricane (which had 915), but if this storm's 910 is taken, then it wasn't broken until the Labor Day hurricane. Given the slight confusion, I opted not to mention what broke it, but if you have a good solution I'm open to change it. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)