Talk:1922 papal conclave
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1922 papal conclave article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]All this "liberal" and "conservative" language is unhelpful. Leo XIII and Benedict XV were hardly liberals - their devotion, doctrine, language, culture was all traditional, and they certainly would not recognise modern "liberal Catholicism." I recognise there were differences between them and St. Pius X, but I would suggest these differences were more concerned with diplomatic policy (e.g. relations with republican France) than with doctrine. But when you use "liberal/conservative" language, you immediately conjure up to modern readers the post-60s Church in which doctrinal liberalism is present within the hierarchy. The language is misleading.
Categories:
- C-Class European Microstates articles
- Unknown-importance European Microstates articles
- C-Class Vatican City articles
- High-importance Vatican City articles
- Vatican City articles
- WikiProject European Microstates articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Mid-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles