Talk:1922–23 Nelson F.C. season/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
I will be the reviewer for this article. I'll begin a read through now and add notes from any issues raised as I come across them. Miyagawa (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Might it be worthwhile adding the team's colours to the infobox? I note they're on the previous season's infobox and although the team photo is in black and white I doubt that the strip significantly changed as teams back then didn't tend to change their colours that much (really even in the modern game it's only the second and third strips that change at all). Miyagawa (talk) 12:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Added. BigDom 12:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Added a cat I thought was missing. Miyagawa (talk) 12:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Can't find any other issues, so time for the review template....
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Overall, a very fine piece of work and an interesting article. Miyagawa (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)