Talk:1920 Madras Presidency Legislative Council election

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1920 Madras Presidency Legislative Council election article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from 1920 Madras Presidency Legislative Council election appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Justice Party won the first election held in Madras Presidency in 1920 after a dyarchical system of government was established in 1919?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

India: Tamil Nadu / Politics Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

strength?

Both these links put the strength of the council at 132? [1][2]. 98 elected members is consistent in all sources. no of nominations is different.--Sodabottle (talk) 05:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hmm. that sucks. I have another reference which puts the strength at 130. I used the one which said 127. since it is well organised in a table form, i thought Saroja put some effort into making sure what she wrote. ---Car Tick 05:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think i have found the reason. [3]. Act specified 98 elected and 29 nominated members. Plus the members of the Executive council which varied. So we get different numbers ranging from 130 to 134. --Sodabottle (talk) 06:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

which page number..---Car Tick 06:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

186. full text of the act is given with electorate descriptions--Sodabottle (talk) 06:16, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

that explains. may be we should only write about the elected members in the infobox and so on. ---Car Tick 06:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wow. that is a good quick work. nominated for DYK. ---Car Tick 06:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

caste breakdown

Eugene Irschick book says, 65 non-Brahman Hindus, 22 Brahmans, 5 Muslims, 14 Indian Christians and 5 outcastes (official appointees). --Car Tick 17:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

differs in indian christians and mohammadans, no europeans. saroja is bound to be more accurate as it tallies with the total.--Sodabottle (talk) 02:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

probably right with the numbers. But she is so much anti-Justice party and glorifies Rajaji in her book. opposite of Rajaram I guess. Indian writers. --Car Tick 04:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:-).. thankfully we got both of them to strike a balance--Sodabottle (talk) 07:28, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Madras Presidency Legislative Council election, 1920. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090114090110/http://www.thestatesman.net:80/page.arcview.php?clid=4&id=155652&usrsess=1 to http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=4&id=155652&usrsess=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Madras Presidency Legislative Council election, 1920. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]