This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia Tech, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Georgia TechWikipedia:WikiProject Georgia TechTemplate:WikiProject Georgia TechGeorgia Tech articles
This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on December 13, 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Note 1 is generally good, but I believe who coined the term is off-topic to this specific season's article. It would be more on-topic in 1917, when the name gained popularity.
This is irrelevant to the GA review, but it would be a crime not to take Bum Day to GA and get that on the main page for DYK on April Fools. Looks like you've already put in some work to that article.
Remove cites 3 and 4 from the lead, as they appear later in the article.
"got his wish" - is that encyclopedic tone? Moreover, it's not sourced that he had a strong "wish" for this game.
Comma needed in the second sentence.
"Pittsburgh was the 1918 national champion." needs a citation.
You have a quote about interceptions making up for fumbles, but neither the interceptions nor the fumbles are otherwise talked about. This could use some context.
The paragraph starting with "Tech managed a modicum of revenge." needs some substantial work. First, "revenge" is adding an editorial spin on things which isn't very neutral. Second, the phrasing throughout is not that great, especially the third sentence. Please rework this to more neutrally present the information.
The "Awards and honors" section needs a cite to cover the last few sentences.
The text to begin the "Awards and honors" is identical to that in the lead. Some similarity is inevitable when covering the same information, but exact duplication is frowned upon. It makes the main article boring to read for those who read the lead. Please vary the language a bit.
Thanks again Rob. It is definitely Fincher in the picture. That's probably him in 1920. He was an assistant coach in 1928. Cake (talk) 07:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MisterCake: Can you replace cite 24 with something else? It's not a reliable source. The statistics site is hosted by a computer science professor who has no apparent expertise related to sports. ~ Rob13Talk03:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I replaced it with Woodruff saying no team in the South compared to Tech; possibly not as clear as the website, which compiles Woodruff, Fred Russell, and others. Cake (talk) 04:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]