Talk:1913 Studebaker strike/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 19:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

I'll be taking a look at this! — GhostRiver 19:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

• "manufacturing plant. Thus the police banned large marches and parades." → "manufacturing plant and a subsequent city ban on large marches and parades."
  • Done.
• "began hiring replacement workers - strikebreakers" → "began hiring strikebreakers"
  • Done.

Background

• "were not long-lasting." → "were short-lived"
  • Done.
• "responding to requests from autoworkers in the city" → "in response to seveal requests" (decrease repetition of "autoworkers in the city")
  • Done, with grammatical fix to "several".
• Subject/verb agreement with the quote: the city was "among", but is only one "metropolis"
  • Fixed.
• "IWW organizers began focusing their efforts"
  • Done.
• "with the organizers initially pushing for" → "who initially pushed for"
  • Done.
• The last sentence has a semicolon where there should be a period
  • Fixed.

Course of the strike

• "(AFL,)" → "(AFL),"
  • Fixed.
• "craft union oriented" → "craft union-oriented"
  • Fixed.
• Unpaired right parenthetical after "at odds with the IWW"
  • Fixed.
• Commas around "presided over by Robbins"
  • Done.

Aftermath

• "organized labor at Detroit" → "organized labor in Detroit"
  • Done.

References

• Good

General comments

• Both photos are in the public domain and are relevant to the article
• I'd recommend moving the first one up a paragraph to avoid disrupting the header line, per MOS:IMAGELOCATION
  • Done.
• No stability concerns in the revision history
• Copyvio score looks great at 10.7%

Putting on hold now to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with any questions. — GhostRiver 19:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

GhostRiver, just pinging to let you know that I made some edits to the article that address your comments. Thank you for starting this review, and if there are any further questions, comments, or concerns about the article, please reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Made one additional edit myself; otherwise, looks good to pass! — GhostRiver 21:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)