Talk:1909 Greater Antilles hurricane/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 21:37, 24 May 2010 (UTC) Hi, this is a nice, clear and concise article. I have made a few copy edits which hopefully are ok. Xtzou (Talk) 21:37, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
Concise and clearly written
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with required MoS
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced where needed
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Nice little article. Brings the storm to life. Xtzou (Talk) 21:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Recent changes/upgrades
[edit]The track image and the text of where the storm struck did not remotely match. I fixed the issue. Somehow, the wrong storm track was attached to this article. Also, moved the wettest TC information for Jamaica into its own template, which is now used in this article. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)