Talk:1900–1901 Cisleithanian legislative election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Former countries: Austria-Hungary

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by the Austria-Hungary task force (assessed as Low-importance).

On 22 February 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to 1900–1901 legislative election in the Empire of Austria (1867–1918). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Requested move 22 February 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. This close applies to all of the other related RMs. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1900–1901 Cisleithanian legislative election → 1900–1901 legislative election in the Empire of Austria (1867–1918) – Per parent Category:Empire of Austria (1867–1918) and per WP:CommonName. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 21:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:NC-GAL, the naming convention for election articles. The current title is the correct naming format, and the rationale is somewhat misleading, as although the category is named as such, the main article is Cisleithania. Number 5 7 14:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But Empire of Austria (1867–1918) is the parent (and main) category of Cisleithania.Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear the category is misnamed; usual practice is for the category name to match the main article. Number 5 7 16:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was a debate at WP:CFD regarding Empire of Austria (1867–1918) vs Cisleithania as the category name; Empire of Austria (1867–1918) won. These renames are to preserve categorical and article consistency. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, well the article itself is still clearly more relevant in terms of naming alignment than the category, plus the title is out of sync with the naming guideline for election articles. If Cisleithania were to be renamed Empire of Austria (1867–1918), then the correct format for the election article would be "1900–1901 Austrian legislative election" rather than the proposed one. Number 5 7 16:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or perhaps "1900–1901 Austrian Empire legislative election". Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is a correctly formulated title at least. However, I would suggestion you request the Cisleithania article be moved before these titles follow. Number 5 7 20:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support as common name. By the way that does not rule out an article Cisleithania about the official name of the Austrian Empire for a few decades. (I was notified on my talk page about this nomination, as I was earlier involved in the category discussion.)Marcocapelle (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of the Cisleithania common name issue, the proposed format is not correct. Election articles like this are titled "XXXX [country adjective/name] election". You are ignoring the naming convention for election articles. Number 5 7 20:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that "Empire of Austria" is the common name for the Austrian half of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Srnec (talk) 17:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: To keep the discussion & arguments being made in this group of RMs from being fractured across multiple talk pages, all future arguments & discussions on several RMs should be made here. The affected RMs are Talk:1848 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022, Talk:1891 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022, Talk:1897 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022, Talk:1907 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022 and Talk:1911 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022. Arguments already made there are moved here accordingly. Please continue the discussion below. Thanks! ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 21:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer: Consider closing all of the aforementioned RMs as per the outcome of the discussion. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 21:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Talk:1891 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022

– Argument made by Srnec is moved here to avoid fracturing of discussion. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 21:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Using "Empire of Austria" in this way is confusing and putting two dates in the title is worse. We could do "1891 Austrian legislative election", however. (My opinion is the same on all these RMs that should have been done as a multi-move.) Srnec (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Elections and Referendums has been notified of this discussion. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 21:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.