Talk:1891 Brooklyn Grooms season
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseball assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:1891 Brooklyn Grooms season/Comments (baseball), and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
There is too little for this to be considered anything but a stub for the moment. There is a head paragraph, but perhaps it needs to be split up and categorized under a "Management" section heading or something more appropriate than the opening head. Expansion on the season itself would strengthen this article because right now a body of how the season played out is missing entirely. Images would help, too. Come and discuss either here or at my page. Thanks Fdssdf (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 22:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJMC89 bot (talk • contribs) 14:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Baseball articles
- Low-importance Baseball articles
- Stub-Class Old-time Base Ball articles
- Low-importance Old-time Base Ball articles
- Old-time Base Ball articles
- Stub-Class Los Angeles Dodgers articles
- Mid-importance Los Angeles Dodgers articles
- Los Angeles Dodgers articles
- WikiProject Baseball articles
- Stub-Class New York (state) articles
- Low-importance New York (state) articles
- Stub-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles