Talk:1889 Brooklyn Bridegrooms season
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseball assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:1889 Brooklyn Bridegrooms season/Comments (baseball), and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Even though there is a table of the players on the Bridegrooms during the 1889 season, there is very little mention of how the season went. The only real mention of baseball, even, is that of the World Series. To elucidate an article like this enough so that the reader may get some information out of it, more substantive content needs to be added. Did the team have any rough patches of losses? There is a picture of the team, which is nice, but it alone means close to nothing. At the moment, we know nothing about how the team reached the World Series. I'm giving this a stub rating. Come and discuss it. Thanks Fdssdf (talk) 22:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 22:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJMC89 bot (talk • contribs) 14:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Baseball articles
- Low-importance Baseball articles
- Stub-Class Old-time Base Ball articles
- Mid-importance Old-time Base Ball articles
- Old-time Base Ball articles
- Stub-Class Los Angeles Dodgers articles
- Mid-importance Los Angeles Dodgers articles
- Los Angeles Dodgers articles
- WikiProject Baseball articles
- Stub-Class New York (state) articles
- Low-importance New York (state) articles
- Stub-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles