Talk:1879 Navy Midshipmen football team/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 08:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I'll give this a review:

Is there a reason why there was no coach?
Football should be linked so it is clear which code it is
If it is American football, I would say that there is no need to specify that when you already have "soccer" in there as well
Is there a reason why they didn't have another team until 1882?
The link to the Pasadena Tournament of Roses should be checked

The pic licence is fine, It does seem like there isn't a lot more than can be added for a one game season. Check these issues then I'll have another look. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to fix all of your concerns. Please let me know if you have any additional ones. Thanks for the review. - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 03:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That looks good to me. Promoted. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 06:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]