Talk:1877 Wimbledon Championship/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ingdalevri (talk · contribs) 03:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Agree
[edit]This article has been nominated for WP:GA. I believe it will reach there in time, but needs a little brushing up at the moment. The article's style quality can be improved, but it is written quite comprehensively in addition to being factually correct. The sources are verifiable as well. Props to any editor who can improve the style of this article. However, I do think it is good enough to be a Good Article. Ingdalevri (talk) 03:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Abandoned
[edit]Per User talk:Ingdalevri#1877 Wimbledon Championship GA review, this review has been abandoned. I am putting it back into the reviewing pool, and would like to suggest to Ingdalevri that if the "Agree" section is going to be the extent of future such reviews, it would be better that GA reviewing is left to others who are willing to use the GA criteria to do a complete job per GA norms. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)