This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Peer Review
Your lead in seems to be focused more on the Colored Conventions Movement as a whole rather than your specific convention. You should give more details about your convention in the lead in, such as where it took place or who in specific was attending, as well as outlining what the rest of your article will talk about. Your structure makes sense, but you might want to change the name of the section "Why the Convention Met" to something like "Topics Discussed at the Convention", which might make a bit more sense. The tone seems fairly neutral, but be sure you are correctly paraphrasing the works that you are citing. Your sources look reliable to me. You should definitely look over your article for grammar mistakes. I think you should also probably refrain from using the term colored people/men, even though that's what the original texts use. Overall, you might want to expand on certain sections, and definitely work on the lead in.Mcdadee (talk) 18:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
