Talk:1838–39 United States House of Representatives elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Robert Hunter

Why was Robert Hunter (leader of a minority party) elected Speaker of the House? This needs to be explained: it is somewhat confusing as it is. 70.61.54.235 March 11, 2013‎

I agree. Is there anyone who is knowledgable about this subject who can clear it up? Nathaniel Greene (talk) 23:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No explanation is given at Robert M. T. Hunter either. Whatever the answer is, it's going to require some deeper research... --IJBall (talk) 18:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Recorded Votes for Anti-Masonic or Conservative Parties

So I've been pulling my popular vote totals from Michael Dubin's United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997, and for the elections within this section I found no recorded votes for the Ant-Masonic Party, and (224) votes for a single Conservative candidate in Maine. Unless there was some sort of coalition between them and the Whigs that isn't immediately apparent.... --Ariostos (talk) 08:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why no anti masons or constervatives

Don't tell me it is about vote totals, records for popular vote were always getting lost back then. https://history.house.gov/Institution/Party-Divisions/Party-Divisions/ says that anti masons and conservatives won, and they are a .gov. Pretty good source if you ask me. I would add it but I'm not that good at this interface. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.8.0.165 (talk) 14:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1788 and 1789 United States House of Representatives elections which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]