Talk:1829 braille

1829 braille is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Writing systems Mid‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Table

I thought expanding the table to all theoretically possible forms was rather confusing, so I reduced it to what Braille proposed. The theory should be evident enough from this and the main braille article, I think. — kwami (talk) 06:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's just fine. Two quick thoughts going forward, though: 1) You only have 96 cells in the pared-down table, but prose says there were 97 patterns used. 2) I still think the excised cells should be present for completeness, maybe in a separate table. Van Isaac_{WS Vex}^contribs 07:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The 97th is the blank cell.

I don't get the point of the theoretical cells. They were never used for anything; AFAICT, not even all the cells in the table were ever used for anything. (Though he did use a few dot-only cells which don't appear in the table.) This system was abandoned so quickly that it's really only of historical interest.

Anyway, thanks for making the table. It's rather ridiculous to expect the visually impaired to read the table in that photo of embossed paper. — kwami (talk) 16:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1829 braille. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/69o3fSsEr?url=http://www.nfb.org/Images/nfb/Publications/braille/TheFirstPublicationoftheBrailleCode.html to http://www.nfb.org/Images/nfb/Publications/braille/TheFirstPublicationoftheBrailleCode.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]