Talk:1725 in literature
Appearance
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Speaking as librarian of the 1692-1798 in literature articles, I have to ask... Is that really necessary? Classification and importance boxes? Really? I should imagine these are chronological listing pages... quite important in their fashion and quite irrelevant in another fashion. They're quite as good as the Oxford Companion to Literature could make them (for the ones I've done) and not very much better. Utgard Loki (talk) 16:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- List-Class Years articles
- Low-importance Years articles
- List-Class Years articles of Low-importance
- List-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- List-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- List-Class novel articles
- Mid-importance novel articles
- WikiProject Novels articles
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles