Talk:15th Battalion (Australia)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 01:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Progression
[edit]- Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
- Version of the article when review was closed: [2]
Technical review
[edit]- Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals no errors with reference consolidation (no action req'd).
- Disambiguations: a few dab links [3]:
- Salient
- Buna
- Wau
- Caloundra, Queensland (redirect page)
- Caloundra (disambiguation)
- Linkrot: external links check reveals one dead link [4]:
- The Forgotten First: The 1st Australian Division in the Great War and its Legacy (info) [army.gov.au]
- Alt text: Images all have alt text [5] (no action req'd).
- Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool reveals no issues with copyright violations or close paraphrasing [6] (no action req'd).
- Duplicate links: on duplicate link:
- Citizens Forces
Criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- I've done a copy edit.
- A couple of technical MOS issues above.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- All major points cited using WP:RS.
- "Chataway 1948, p. 130–132" should be presented with "pp" instead of "p" as its a page range.
- No issues with OR.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Most major points seem to be covered without going into undue detail.
- Level of coverage seems appropriate.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- No issues here.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No issues here.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
- Images are PD and seem appropriate to the article.
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- Just a couple of minor technical fixes req'd, otherwise good. Anotherclown (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review this. I think I've fixed all the issues identified above. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- Changes look fine. Passing now. Anotherclown (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Cheers, have a good one. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Changes look fine. Passing now. Anotherclown (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review this. I think I've fixed all the issues identified above. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)