Talk:153rd Cavalry Regiment

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 153rd Cavalry Regiment article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: North America / United States / World War I / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

First Squadron or 153rd Cavalry

It is unclear in the lead paragraph whether this article is about the 153rd Cavalry or the First Squadron of the 153rd Cavalry. Please start the article with the name of the subject in boldface to clarify. Do not start the article with the name of a subsidiary unit. Folklore1 (talk) 20:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 153rd Cavalry Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121021063342/https://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/cav/153cvrg.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/cav/153cvrg.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to Merge AmericanAir88 (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Molestash: I have completed your request. Please fill this section out with a description of why you wish to merge the article. AmericanAir88 (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Single troops are not notable enough for a stand alone article. History of both 153rd Cavalry Regiment and Troop B, 1-153 Cavalry will be similar and both can be better covered together. --Molestash (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I agree, to increase notability, a merger is necessary. AmericanAir88 (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Agree, troop and company-level sub-units are below the threshold set at WP:MILUNIT. There are exceptions, but this won't be one of them. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Agree. This unit is not particularly notable, and appears to contain much original research that is not repeatable. 82redleg (talk) 19:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.