Jump to content

Talk:14th Street Tunnel shutdown/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Opening statement

[edit]

In reviews I conduct, I may make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use  Done,  Fixed, plus Added,  Not done,  Doing..., or minus Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. —♠Vami_IV†♠ 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Hi again. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Vami IV: Thanks for the quick review. I have resolved these issues. epicgenius (talk) 16:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Background

[edit]
  • Combine the parts of "Background" that deal with the damage caused by Hurricane Sandy into Paragraph 1, and those that deal with the immediate aftermath into Paragraph 2. In October 2012, Hurricane Sandy caused severe damage to New York City, Should ideally launch into The storm flooded nine of the system's 14 underwater tunnels [...] and completely destroyed a portion of the IND Rockaway Line (A train) in Queens, [...].
    •  Done
  • Elaborate on this years of needed repairs.
    •  Done The repairs were staggered over several years.

Planning

[edit]
  • <s.Citation [6] is repeated three times without need in the first paragraph of "Closure options".
    • minus Removed
  • between Bedford Avenue in Brooklyn and Eighth Avenue in Manhattan Specify that "Bedford Avenue" and "Eighth Avenue" here are stations and not the streets.
    •  Done
  • The L train needs a wikilink.
    •  Done
  • and running the M to [...] G, J/Z and M [...] of the G would [...] The M's peak [...] except for the A and R would [...] The J/Z and M would [...] The G would also [...] the G would not [...] suspended L service Expand with the word "train"/"trains".
    •  Done
  • and East Village, Manhattan, Consider "the East Village".
    •  Done
  • Lorimer Street (J and ​M trains), Redundant link to the M train here.
    •  Rearranged
  • The SBS, NYCDOT, NYCEDC acronyms are not explained.
    •  Done
  • speeded up transit times sped up
    •  Done
  • transit times for transit riders Delete one of these "transits".
    •  Done
  • January 6, 2019, three months before the tunnel is set to shut down This should not be present-tense.
    •  Done
  • Free transfers will be available If this is supposed to be present-tense, use "are". If not, "would".
  • ferry and two Select Bus Service routes [...] the L5 will not be a Select Bus Service route Redundant links for SBS.
    •  Done Also, I trimmed this a bit since the route was not implemented.
  • analysis of possible effect the possible effect
    •  Done
  • What's a benchwall?
    • plus Added
  • The busway would have the same vehicle restrictions as originally planned: the only vehicles that could use the busway would be buses, trucks making deliveries on 14th Street, emergency and Access-A-Ride vehicles, and local traffic traveling for no more than one block. Nothing after the colon here is required.
    •  Done
  • However, the busway was not implemented as scheduled in July 2019.[94][95] The implementation of the busway was pushed back to August,[96][97] before finally taking effect on October 3, 2019.[98][99] Condense.
    •  Done

GA progress

[edit]

Images are relevant and free, though few in number. Article passes copyvio scanning with 23% likelihood. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.