Talk:14 Arietis

Untitled

Is this a binary star? RJFJR (talk) 14:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to be an astrometric binary. Regards, RJH (talk) 18:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference issue

I checked the content of the listed references, partly out of curiosity and partly due to their excess, and although they mostly contain interesting information, found no connection to the content of the article. At least nothing obvious or clear. So to me the article, though apparently accurate, remains unsubstantiated.

There are however good, easy to reach online, references that do substantiate the claims made which can be found by direct query.

Also since the references given come up with ordinary url addresses, it seems the added bibcodes, dois, and other such indicators are superfluous extras that simply take up space. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 22:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 14 Arietis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6630AbtJZ?url=http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html to http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]