Talk:129 (barge)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 21:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I'd expect to see this linked at 129.
Also redirects at Barge 129 and No.129 as you list them as alternative names (in bold).
"experimental ship" reads odd to me, ships?
"of Cleveland, Ohio in " comma after Ohio.
"and in 1901, she" perhaps "and the following year" to break up the "in X" repeat.
"1902 129 was" comma after 1902.
"ended up breaking away" -> "broke away"
"from Maunaloa. Maunaloa turned" repetitive.
" inventor[2] and entrepreneur," just put that [2] at the end of the sentence.
"in Superior, Wisconsin in " comma after Wisconsin.
"1892 and 1893 in Superior, Wisconsin" overlinked.
"unrigged barge and" link unrigged, unlink barge
"by the American Steel Barge Company for" overlinked.
"US official number 53276." link.
"wheat from Superior, Wisconsin" overlinked again.
"downbound" link.
"the collision.[9] 129 was a total" merge
"fourth whaleback to be" you link it here? It's mentioned in the first sentence of the article after the lead.
Likewise for Great Lakes.
I don't see this mentioned in "Shipwrecks and maritime incidents in 1902" template.

On hold for now. Suggest you apply the common fixes across all other such articles to save time later! The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 11:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm promoting now, might be taking another one soon, so try to fix these common issues across the remainder of your nominations! Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 20:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]