Talk:Eleven Times Square

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

11 Times Square, this is in new york

—{{subst:Adam Busbin}}

Done. That was a weird one. Deor (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spam edit fixing

A spam edit added a lot of info and in a rare event even bare url references but removed some old info and messed up the format. It needed work anyway. B137 (talk) 23:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's old news now I'm not sure if it's worth mentioning that the building was empty until the law firm moved in in January 2011. It reflects on the economy of the time. Now it just goes into a tenant list with no mention that the building went through hard times. B137 (talk) 00:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

100th tallest

I know there is sort of a convention that when a building is on a "list of tallest" list (and so many of these have been conformed to meet a standardized "featured" format that includes all buildings having an article) to name where it ranks on the list in its individual article, just like how some of the tallest in a city list will mention their national or world ranking. However, these tend to be inaccurate as they are so often out of date. Before I fixed the spam, this article still said it was the 88th-tallest in the city, when it now is apparently the 100th; at what point does this ranking become trite? B137 (talk) 16:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the ranking stops mattering when the ranking goes higher than 100, because it would then no longer be on the list of tallest buildings in New York City. Epic Genius (talk) 15:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Yes it would as long as they are at least 600 feet tall. And I'm talking about all the buildings linked from that list except maybe the top five. B137 (talk) 20:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@B137: Oh, I see what you mean. After #20 or so, the ranking basically stops mattering to most people, because if 11 Times Square is 100th tallest, then there are 99 buildings taller than it. That is not a very great distinction when NYC has literally hundreds of skyscrapers. Epic Genius (talk) 20:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Yeah, it's a double edged sword, though. In a smaller city being ~20th tallest doesn't mean much, but in NYC which is famous for skyscrapers, 20th out of the massive total is significant. But at the same time in such a city these rankings change so often that unless there were some sort of code or template to automatically update the rankings everywhere they appear, they should not be mentioned after five or ten. B137 (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@B137: In that case, maybe we should remove the rankings for this page. As for the top 10 tallest buildings, maybe a template could be added, but I haven't worked the kinks of that one out yet. Epic Genius (talk) 00:19, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]