Talk:104 Aquarii
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
What is annual parallax of secondary
[edit]Why don't we have a parallax for the secondary so it can be confirmed as a binary ? Do we have a lower bound for an orbital period ? - Rod57 (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- There is a parallax for the secondary, but it doesn't give strong support to the binary idea. They are separated by a long way, have somewhat different parallaxes, and very different proper motions. Not sure if the article needs mnore information or less about the companion since it has separate HD and HIP designations. Lithopsian (talk) 13:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 104 Aquarii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6630AbtJZ?url=http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html to http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)