Talk:1031 Canal

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

United States: Louisiana / New Orleans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as Low-importance).

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Building Article

Hi,

I'm still in the process of building this article. 1031 Canal is the largest structure being planned for new construction in downtown New Orleans. It is particularly relevant due to the controversy surronding the height variances required for its construction. Following months of debate these variances were recently approved with provisions by the New Orleans city council in a 5-2 vote.

Whomever nominated the article for deletion must post a reason here in the discussion section per Wikipedia policy.

-Bmhs823 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmhs823 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting this comment over a decade later, I wonder if this can be seen as evidence of the widespread systemic corruption around the case. The investigation was mired in evidence of corruption including wistleblower/witness intimidation and the suppression of evidence. I wouldn't be surprised if interfering with Wikipedia articles as they were written would have been on the itinerary. George Mucus (talk) 05:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]