Talk:10121 Arzamas

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Notability tag

Im starting a discussion on its notability, to establish if it should be redirected or kept. Alerting Praemonitus (who tagged it for notability), Captain panda (creator), SarekOfVulcan who once prodded it and DGG who removed prod. Any inpu would be very welcome. Boleyn (talk) 11:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2 weeks after Boleyn's post (2 days from now) seems like a reasonable time to wait for notability info to be stated in the article, especially after Kheider's response regarding MBAs numbered > 10,000. I'll #redirect after that time. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 20:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That seems reasonable. Boleyn (talk) 22:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The most notable thing that I can find about 10121 Arzamas is that the provisional designation has BS in it and it makes meaningless BS close approaches to Jupiter. Beavis and Butt-Head might want to keep it. -- Kheider (talk) 03:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did a re-write on 10121 Arzamas, based on the available information I found. Speaking of "BS", I have now dealt with these kind of articles for six months in a row, maybe it's time we start a serious conversation to clear things up? I'm ready for it, anytime, anywhere, for as long as it takes. Cheers, Rfassbind – talk 13:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]