Talk:100 euro note/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "The changeover period during which the former currencies' notes and coins were exchanged for those of the euro lasted about two months, until 28 February 2002." should include the start date.  Done

   "Their aim is to record is to ascertain details about its spread and to generate statistics and rankings for various notes." needs to be reworked.  Done

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Reference #9 doesn't go anywhere.  Done

   Reference #10 is a dead link. Has been dead since 2012-07-01.  Done

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: - Article has been kept.

Comment

Please extend the 'on hold' time by 12-24hrs. as I just found out about this today. – Plarem ^{(User talk)} 14:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Scratch that, I'm done! – Plarem ^{(User talk)} 15:04, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for any confusion, I should have elaborated. I meant I put it on hold for 24 hours and I would comeback in 24 hours and assess what was done. But anyways it has been kept! Obtund^Talk 22:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)