Talk:...And Found

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ...And Found article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Episode coverage / Lost Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Lost task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Goodwin/Others

Eko informs Jin the man's name was "Goodwin", and indicates that Goodwin was killed by the "Others."

That line should be changed. In the episode, it's intentionally not clear as to whether Eko is insinuating that Goodwin was affiliated with the Others or killed by them (which turns out not to be true anyways). I'd do it myself but, at the moment, I'm too tired to come up with something that gets the point across in an eloquent way. Pumpkingrrl 06:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made this change.

Edit: Removed reference to future episode/spoiler. I dont think that information not presented in or before this current episode should be in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.199.2.154 (talk) 20:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan 20:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Nathan[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lost-...AndFound.jpg

Image:Lost-...AndFound.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]